Skip to contents

rush is a package for asynchronous and decentralized optimization in R. It uses a database-centric architecture in which workers communicate through a shared Redis database, each independently executing its own optimization loop. This vignette demonstrates the basic functionality of rush through three examples of increasing complexity.

General Structure

A rush network consists of multiple workers that communicate via a shared Redis database. Each worker evaluates tasks and pushes the corresponding results back to the database, as illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1: The communication flow between a worker and the Redis database in a rush network. The octagon represents a worker and the rectangle represents the Redis database. Each worker W runs its own instance of the optimizer \(\mathcal{O}\), evaluates the objective function \(f\), and exchanges task information via a shared Redis database. Arrows indicate the flow of information: workers retrieve completed tasks via $fetch_finished_tasks(), propose and store new tasks via $push_running_tasks(), and report results via $finish_tasks().

We begin with a simple random search to illustrate the core concepts of rush. Although random search does not require communication between workers, it introduces the worker loop, tasks, and the manager.

We use the Branin function \(f\) as the optimization target:

\[f(x_1,x_2)=\left(x_2-\frac{5.1}{4\pi^2}x_1^2+\frac{5}{\pi}x_1-6\right)^2 +10\left(1-\frac{1}{8\pi}\right)\cos(x_1)+10\]

The function is optimized over the domain \(x_1 \in [-5, 10]\) and \(x_2 \in [0, 15]\). It is a commonly used benchmark function that is fast to evaluate yet sufficiently nontrivial.

branin = function(x1, x2) {
  (x2 - 5.1 / (4 * pi^2) * x1^2 + 5 / pi * x1 - 6)^2 +
    10 * (1 - 1 / (8 * pi)) * cos(x1) +
    10
}

Branin function

Worker Loop

We define the worker_loop function, which is executed by each worker. The function repeatedly samples a random point, evaluates it using the Branin function, and writes the result to the Redis database. It takes a RushWorker object (rush) and the objective function branin as arguments. The loop terminates after 100 tasks have been evaluated.

library(rush)

wl_random_search = function(rush, branin) {
  while (rush$n_finished_tasks < 100) {

    xs = list(x1 = runif(1, -5, 10), x2 = runif(1, 0, 15))
    key = rush$push_running_tasks(xss = list(xs))

    ys = list(y = branin(xs$x1, xs$x2))
    rush$finish_tasks(key, yss = list(ys))
  }
}

The worker loop relies on two principal methods. The $push_running_tasks() method creates a new task in the database, marks it as "running", and returns a unique key identifying it. The $finish_tasks() method takes this key along with the result and writes it to the database, marking the task as "finished". The $n_finished_tasks field tracks the number of completed tasks and serves as the termination criterion. Marking the task as "running" before evaluation is not essential for random search, but is important for algorithms that use the states of other workers’ tasks to inform the next proposal.

Tasks

Tasks are the basic units through which workers exchange information. Each task consists of four components: a unique key, a computational state, an input (xs), and an output (ys). The input and output are lists that may contain arbitrary data. Tasks pass through one of four computational states: "running", "finished", "failed", and "queued". The $push_running_tasks() method creates tasks marked as "running" and returns their keys. Upon completion, $finish_tasks() marks tasks as "finished" and stores the associated results. Tasks that encounter errors can be marked as "failed" using the $fail_tasks() method. The fourth state, "queued", supports a queue mechanism described in Section 4.1.

Manager

The Rush manager class is responsible for starting, monitoring, and stopping workers within the network. It is initialized using the rsh() function, which requires a network identifier and a config argument. The config argument specifies a configuration file used to connect to the Redis database via the redux package.

config = redux::redis_config()

rush = rsh(
  network = "example-random-search",
  config = config)

Workers are started using the $start_workers() method which accepts the worker loop and the number of workers as arguments. Any additional named arguments are forwarded to the worker loop function. The workers run on mirai daemons which are started with the mirai::daemons() function.

mirai::daemons(4)

rush$start_workers(
  worker_loop = wl_random_search,
  n_workers = 4,
  branin = branin)

rush

── <Rush> ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Running Workers: 0
• Queued Tasks: 0
• Running Tasks: 0
• Finished Tasks: 0
• Failed Tasks: 0

Once the optimization completes, the results can be retrieved from the database. The $fetch_finished_tasks() method returns a data.table containing the task key, input, and result. The worker_id column identifies the worker that evaluated the task. Further auxiliary information can be passed to $push_running_tasks() and $finish_tasks() via the extra argument.

rush$fetch_finished_tasks()[order(y)]
         worker_id        x1        x2           y          keys
            <char>     <num>     <num>       <num>        <char>
  1: cubistic_w...  3.020835  2.376699   0.4678446 db102b36-5...
  2: enchanting... -3.199975 12.951161   0.7009148 557f726e-6...
  3: expectable...  9.123333  2.203044   0.8317259 de9bfa0b-2...
  4: cubistic_w...  9.533874  1.693296   1.2210627 e4f8b0c7-5...
  5: enchanting...  9.298305  3.329933   1.3953158 f8bfe2a7-a...
 ---
 99: enchanting... -4.251850  2.390405 167.3287820 df5b207a-8...
100: enchanting...  7.752703 14.005014 169.2087501 14c9fa26-d...
101: feudalist_...  5.082227 14.152152 179.9855068 99267eb2-6...
102: expectable...  4.951402 14.421034 184.7830377 37fb074f-4...
103: feudalist_...  5.992389 14.583176 200.9500496 0566528a-2...

Printing the rush object displays the number of running workers and the number of tasks in each state.

rush

── <Rush> ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Running Workers: 0
• Queued Tasks: 0
• Running Tasks: 0
• Finished Tasks: 103
• Failed Tasks: 0

Note

The total of tasks slightly exceeds 100 because workers check the stopping condition independently: if multiple workers evaluate the condition concurrently — for example, when 99 tasks are finished — each may create a new task before detecting that the limit has been reached.

The workers can be stopped and the database reset using the $reset() method.

rush$reset()

rush

── <Rush> ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Running Workers: 0
• Queued Tasks: 0
• Running Tasks: 0
• Finished Tasks: 0
• Failed Tasks: 0

Median Stopping Rule

Random search evaluates configurations independently and requires no communication between workers. We next demonstrate a more sophisticated algorithm in which workers share intermediate results to make early stopping decisions. We tune an XGBoost model on the mtcars dataset using the median stopping rule: a configuration is abandoned if its performance at a given training iteration falls below the median of all completed evaluations at the same iteration.

Worker Loop

Each worker samples a random hyperparameter configuration and trains the model incrementally from 5 to 20 boosting rounds. After each round, the worker fetches all completed tasks and compares its RMSE against the median RMSE at the same iteration. If performance falls below the median, the worker discards the configuration and starts a new one. The loop terminates once 1000 evaluations have been recorded.

wl_median_stopping = function(rush, training_ids, test_ids, mtcars_data, response) {
  while (rush$n_finished_tasks < 1000) {
    params = list(
      max_depth = sample(1:20, 1),
      lambda = runif(1, 0, 1),
      alpha = runif(1, 0, 1)
    )

    model = NULL
    for (iteration in seq(5, 20)) {

      key = rush$push_running_tasks(xss = list(c(params, list(nrounds = iteration))))

      model = xgboost::xgboost(
        data = as.matrix(mtcars_data[training_ids, ]),
        label = response[training_ids],
        nrounds = if (is.null(model)) 5 else 1,
        params = params,
        xgb_model = model,
        verbose = 0
      )

      pred = predict(model, as.matrix(mtcars_data[test_ids, ]))
      rmse = sqrt(mean((pred - response[test_ids])^2))

      rush$finish_tasks(key, yss = list(list(rmse = rmse)))

      tasks = rush$fetch_finished_tasks()
      ref = tasks[nrounds == iteration, rmse]
      if (length(ref) > 0 && rmse > median(ref)) break
    }
  }
}

We prepare the dataset, initialize the network, and start the workers. The training and test splits are passed explicitly as arguments to the worker loop.

data(mtcars)

training_ids = sample(seq_len(nrow(mtcars)), 20)
test_ids = setdiff(seq_len(nrow(mtcars)), training_ids)
mtcars_data = mtcars[, -1]
response = mtcars$mpg

config = redux::redis_config()

rush = rsh(
  network = "example-median-stopping",
  config = config)

mirai::daemons(4)

rush$start_workers(
  worker_loop = wl_median_stopping,
  n_workers = 4,
  training_ids = training_ids,
  test_ids = test_ids,
  mtcars_data = mtcars_data,
  response = response)

We fetch the finished tasks and sort them by the objective value.

rush$fetch_finished_tasks()[order(rmse)]
       worker_id max_depth     lambda     alpha nrounds     rmse          keys
          <char>     <int>      <num>     <num>   <int>    <num>        <char>
1: brokendown...        11 0.69531934 0.2800600       5 3.856367 1f2358ec-9...
2: lexicograp...         6 0.09252243 0.7208429       5 3.856367 3d4b1698-7...
3: musicianly...        15 0.08172237 0.1103542       5 3.856367 be3af6d0-2...
4: perfumy_pt...         3 0.94332131 0.2290732       5 3.856367 3143a10a-0...
5: brokendown...        11 0.69531934 0.2800600       6 3.859831 f798f875-9...
6: brokendown...        11 0.69531934 0.2800600       7 3.859831 bee312ac-9...
7: lexicograp...         6 0.09252243 0.7208429       6 3.859831 5c64edca-2...

We stop the workers and reset the database.

rush$reset()

Bayesian Optimization

We implement Asynchronous Decentralized Bayesian Optimization (ADBO) (Egelé et al. 2023) which demonstrates the use of shared task information and the queue mechanism. ADBO runs sequential Bayesian optimization on multiple workers in parallel. Each worker maintains its own surrogate model and independently proposes the next configuration by maximizing an upper confidence bound acquisition function. To promote varying exploration–exploitation trade-offs across workers, the \(\lambda\) parameter of the acquisition function is sampled independently for each worker. When a worker completes an evaluation, it shares the result via the database; other workers incorporate this information into their local surrogate models on the next iteration.

Queues

While the typical task lifecycle in rush is running to finished, the package also supports a queue mechanism for cases in which tasks are created centrally and distributed to workers. We initialize the rush network and push an initial Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) design to the queue. Structured designs such as LHS can outperform random designs, but generating them requires a global view of the design space. A queue avoids redundant evaluations: the design is generated once in the main process, and workers draw tasks from the shared queue.

config = redux::redis_config()

rush = rsh(
  network = "example-bayesian-optimization",
  config = config)
lhs_points = lhs::maximinLHS(n = 25, k = 2)
x1_lower = -5
x1_range = 15
x2_lower = 0
x2_range = 15

xss = lapply(1:25, function(i) {
  # rescale to the domain
  list(x1 = lhs_points[i, 1] * x1_range + x1_lower, x2 = lhs_points[i, 2] * x2_range + x2_lower)
})

rush$push_tasks(xss = xss)

rush

── <Rush> ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Running Workers: 0
• Queued Tasks: 25
• Running Tasks: 0
• Finished Tasks: 0
• Failed Tasks: 0

Worker Loop

The worker loop first drains the initial design queue using the $pop_task() method, which retrieves the next queued task, marks it as "running", and returns it. If the queue is empty, $pop_task() returns NULL, signaling the transition to the model-based optimization phase.

wl_bayesian_optimization = function(rush, branin) {
  repeat {
    task = rush$pop_task()
    if (is.null(task)) break
    ys = list(y = branin(task$xs$x1, task$xs$x2))
    rush$finish_tasks(task$key, yss = list(ys))
  }

  lambda = runif(1, 0.01, 10)

  while (rush$n_finished_tasks < 100) {

    archive = rush$fetch_tasks_with_state(states = c("running", "finished"))
    mean_y = mean(archive$y, na.rm = TRUE)
    archive["running", y := mean_y, on = "state"]

    surrogate = ranger::ranger(
      y ~ x1 + x2,
      data = archive,
      num.trees = 100L,
      keep.inbag = TRUE)

    xdt = data.table::data.table(x1 = runif(1000, -5, 10), x2 = runif(1000, 0, 15))
    p = predict(surrogate, xdt, type = "se", se.method = "jack")
    cb = p$predictions - lambda * p$se
    xs = as.list(xdt[which.min(cb)])

    key = rush$push_running_tasks(xss = list(xs))
    ys = list(y = branin(xs$x1, xs$x2))
    rush$finish_tasks(key, yss = list(ys))
  }
}

The $fetch_tasks_with_state() method retrieves all tasks in the specified states from the database, returning a data.table containing task states, keys, inputs, and results. Using $fetch_tasks_with_state() rather than separate calls to $fetch_running_tasks() and $fetch_finished_tasks() prevents tasks from appearing twice if a state transition occurs during the fetch.

We start four workers and wait for the optimization to complete.

mirai::daemons(4)

rush$start_workers(
  worker_loop = wl_bayesian_optimization,
  n_workers = 4,
  branin = branin)
rush$fetch_finished_tasks()[order(y)]
         worker_id        x1         x2           y          keys
            <char>     <num>      <num>       <num>        <char>
  1: unimportan... -3.318567 12.9559890   0.6111823 019b8dc7-0...
  2: unimportan...  2.915507  1.9395178   0.9109868 ae862228-b...
  3: unimportan...  2.791931  2.9409534   1.1214080 b1666240-6...
  4: unimportan... -3.103136 13.0519048   1.1603790 6e1f6aee-f...
  5: unimportan...  3.097818  1.1244228   1.8112216 b526285c-d...
 ---
 99: locustal_x... -4.523052  1.6502972 209.5835757 eb1f8dff-f...
100: ununquadiu... -4.685523  1.4703263 229.4648472 4cbd4f8e-5...
101: locustal_x... -4.712078  1.5368841 229.9553465 a56f1c14-6...
102: locustal_x... -4.500842  0.3517214 246.0241606 1bceabdf-2...
103: spacious_w... -4.925289  1.1016286 263.9185300 71c3815b-e...
Egelé, Romain, Isabelle Guyon, Venkatram Vishwanath, and Prasanna Balaprakash. 2023. “Asynchronous Decentralized Bayesian Optimization for Large Scale Hyperparameter Optimization.” 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science), 1–10.